The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Brazilian Congress, 2014 elections and governability challenges
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brazilian Political Science Review (Online), January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1590/1981-38212014000200005 |
Authors |
Fabiano Santos, Júlio Canello |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 6% |
Brazil | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 13 | 76% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2016.
All research outputs
#761,911
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Political Science Review (Online)
#2
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,609
of 359,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Political Science Review (Online)
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them