↓ Skip to main content

Consenso latino-americano de hipertensão em pacientes com diabetes tipo 2 e síndrome metabólica

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consenso latino-americano de hipertensão em pacientes com diabetes tipo 2 e síndrome metabólica
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia, April 2014
DOI 10.1590/0004-2730000003019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricio López-Jaramillo, Ramiro A. Sánchez, Margarita Diaz, Leonardo Cobos, Alfonso Bryce, Jose Z. Parra-Carrillo, Fernando Lizcano, Fernando Lanas, Isaac Sinay, Iván D. Sierra, Ernesto Peñaherrera, Mario Bendersky, Helena Schmid, Rodrigo Botero, Manuel Urina, Joffre Lara, Milton C. Foss, Gustavo Márquez, Stephen Harrap, Agustín J. Ramírez, Alberto Zanchetti

Abstract

The present document has been prepared by a group of experts, members of cardiology, endocrinology, internal medicine, nephrology and diabetes societies of Latin American countries, to serve as a guide to physicians taking care of patients with diabetes, hypertension and comorbidities or complications of both conditions. Although the concept of metabolic syndrome is currently disputed, the higher prevalence in Latin America of that cluster of metabolic alterations has suggested that metabolic syndrome is a useful nosography entity in the context of Latin American medicine. Therefore, in the present document, particular attention is paid to this syndrome in order to alert physicians on a particular high-risk population, usually underestimated and undertreated. These recommendations result from presentations and debates by discussion panels during a 2-day conference held in Bucaramanga, in October 2012, and all the participants have approved the final conclusions. The authors acknowledge that the publication and diffusion of guidelines do not suffice to achieve the recommended changes in diagnostic or therapeutic strategies, and plan suitable interventions overcoming knowledge, attitude and behavioural barriers, preventing both physicians and patients from effectively adhering to guideline recommendations.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Paraguay 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 23%
Student > Master 19 22%
Student > Postgraduate 12 14%
Professor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 15 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2015.
All research outputs
#10,190,997
of 13,351,576 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia
#215
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,138
of 224,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,351,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them