↓ Skip to main content

3D printed cardiovascular models for surgical planning in complex congenital heart diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
3D printed cardiovascular models for surgical planning in complex congenital heart diseases
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-17-s1-p196
Authors

Israel Valverde, Gorka Gomez, Cristina Suarez-Mejias, Amir-Reza Hosseinpour, Mark Hazekamp, Arno Roest, Jaime F Vazquez-Jimenez, Issam El-Rassi, Sergio Uribe, Tomas Gomez-Cia

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 14 27%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 19 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2017.
All research outputs
#6,324,774
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#411
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,818
of 362,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#6
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.