↓ Skip to main content

ERAP1 biology and assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
ERAP1 biology and assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2015
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1501475112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip C. Robinson, Matthew A. Brown

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 7%
South Africa 1 7%
Qatar 1 7%
Unknown 12 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Master 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#3,478,302
of 5,252,026 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#34,630
of 38,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,659
of 155,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#882
of 1,001 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,252,026 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,001 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.