↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of diagnostic ultrasound in measuring the multifidus muscle

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability of diagnostic ultrasound in measuring the multifidus muscle
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12998-015-0059-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eirik Johan Skeie, Jan Arve Borge, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde, Jenni Bolton, Niels Wedderkopp

Abstract

Ultrasound is frequently used to measure activity in the lumbar multifidus muscle (LMM). However previous reliability studies on diagnostic ultrasound and LMM have included a limited number of subjects and few have used Bland-Altman's Limits of Agreement (LOA). Further one does not know if activity affects the subjects' ability to contract the LMM. From January 2012 to December 2012 an inter- and intra-examiner reliability study was carried out in a clinical setting. It consisted of a total of four experiments with 30 subjects in each study. Two experienced examiners performed all measurements. Ultrasound measurements were made of: 1. the LMM in the resting state, 2. during a contracted state, 3. on subsequent days, and, before and after walking. Reliability and agreement was tested for 1. resting LMM, 2. contracted LMM, and 3. thickness change in the LMM. Mean values of three measurements were used for statistical analysis for each spinal level. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) 3.1 and 3.2 was used to test for reliability, and Bland-Altman's LOA method to test for agreement. All of the studies indicate high levels of reliability, but as the LMM thickness increased (increasing contraction) the agreement between examiners was poorer than for low levels of contraction. The use of diagnostic ultrasound to measure the LMM seems to be reliable in subjects who have little or no change in thickness of the LMM with contraction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor 5 8%
Other 18 29%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 11 17%