↓ Skip to main content

popRange: a highly flexible spatially and temporally explicit Wright-Fisher simulator

Overview of attention for article published in Source Code for Biology and Medicine, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
popRange: a highly flexible spatially and temporally explicit Wright-Fisher simulator
Published in
Source Code for Biology and Medicine, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13029-015-0036-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberly F McManus

Abstract

Sequencing and genotyping technology advancements have led to massive, growing repositories of spatially explicit genetic data and increasing quantities of temporal data (i.e., ancient DNA). These data will allow more complex and fine-scale inferences about population history than ever before; however, new methods are needed to test complex hypotheses. This article presents popRange, a forward genetic simulator, which incorporates large-scale genetic data with stochastic spatially and temporally explicit demographic and selective models. Features such as spatially and temporally variable selection coefficients and demography are incorporated in a highly flexible manner. popRange is implemented as an R package and presented with an example simulation exploring a selected allele's trajectory in multiple subpopulations. popRange allows researchers to evaluate and test complex scenarios by simulating large-scale data with complicated demographic and selective features. popRange is available for download at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/popRange/index.html.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Lecturer 3 15%
Other 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 25%
Computer Science 2 10%
Mathematics 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,389,706
of 24,862,067 outputs
Outputs from Source Code for Biology and Medicine
#71
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,751
of 269,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Source Code for Biology and Medicine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,067 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them