You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative effectiveness of silvicultural interventions for increasing timber production and sustaining conservation values in natural tropical production forests. A systematic review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-015-0034-7 |
| Authors |
Gillian Petrokofsky, Plinio Sist, Lilian Blanc, Jean-Louis Doucet, Bryan Finegan, Sylvie Gourlet-Fleury, John R Healey, Barbara Livoreil, Robert Nasi, Marielos Peña-Claros, Francis E Putz, Wen Zhou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| French Guiana | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 22% |
| Researcher | 29 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 54 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 32% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,694,483
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#168
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,123
of 279,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.