↓ Skip to main content

Video calls from lay bystanders to dispatch centers - risk assessment of information security

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Video calls from lay bystanders to dispatch centers - risk assessment of information security
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-11-244
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stein R Bolle, Per Hasvold, Eva Henriksen

Abstract

Video calls from mobile phones can improve communication during medical emergencies. Lay bystanders can be instructed and supervised by health professionals at Emergency Medical Communication Centers. Before implementation of video mobile calls in emergencies, issues of information security should be addressed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 38%
Computer Science 6 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 10 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2011.
All research outputs
#2,325,487
of 4,506,116 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,326
of 2,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,608
of 66,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#45
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,506,116 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,076 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.