↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge Cartography

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Knowledge Cartography'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Empirical Studies of the Value of Conceptually Explicit Notations in Collaborative Learning
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Concept Mapping Using CmapTools to Enhance Meaningful Learning
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Enhancing Collaborative and Meaningful Language Learning Through Concept Mapping
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Thinking Maps®: A Visual Language for Learning
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Constructivist Mapping of Internet Information at Work with Nestor
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Cognitive and Pedagogical Benefits of Argument Mapping: LAMP Guides the Way to Better Thinking
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Scaffolding School Pupils’ Scientific Argumentation with Evidence-based Dialogue Maps
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Argument Diagramming: The Araucaria Project
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Mapping the Curriculum: How Concept Maps can Improve the Effectiveness of Course Development
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Using Compendium as a Tool to Support the Design of Learning Activities
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Performing Knowledge Art: Understanding Collaborative Cartography
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Knowledge Cartography for Controversies: The Iraq Debate
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Computer Supported Argument Visualisation: Modelling in Consultative Democracy Around Wicked Problems
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Human-Agent Knowledge Cartography for e-Science: NASA Field Trials at the Mars Desert Research Station
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Template-Based Structured Argumentation
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 An Experience of the Use of the Cognitive Mapping Method in Qualitative Research
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Collaborative Knowledge Modelling with a Graphical Knowledge Representation Tool: A Strategy to Support the Transfer of Expertise in Organisations
Attention for Chapter 10: Using Compendium as a Tool to Support the Design of Learning Activities
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Using Compendium as a Tool to Support the Design of Learning Activities
Chapter number 10
Book title
Knowledge Cartography
Published in
ADS, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/978-1-84800-149-7_10
Book ISBNs
978-1-84800-148-0, 978-1-84800-149-7
Authors

Gráinne Conole, Conole, Gráinne

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Lecturer 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#9,285
of 37,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,748
of 156,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#158
of 529 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 529 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.