↓ Skip to main content

IgE Antibodies: Generation and Function

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: IgE Immunotherapy Against Cancer.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
IgE Immunotherapy Against Cancer.
Chapter number 6
Book title
IgE Antibodies: Generation and Function
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-13725-4_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-913724-7, 978-3-31-913725-4, 978-3-31-913724-7, 978-3-31-913725-4
Authors

Lai Sum Leoh, Tracy R Daniels-Wells, Manuel L Penichet, Leoh LS, Daniels-Wells TR, Penichet ML, Tracy R. Daniels-Wells, Manuel L. Penichet

Abstract

The success of antibody therapy in cancer is consistent with the ability of these molecules to activate immune responses against tumors. Experience in clinical applications, antibody design, and advancement in technology have enabled antibodies to be engineered with enhanced efficacy against cancer cells. This allows re-evaluation of current antibody approaches dominated by antibodies of the IgG class with a new light. Antibodies of the IgE class play a central role in allergic reactions and have many properties that may be advantageous for cancer therapy. IgE-based active and passive immunotherapeutic approaches have been shown to be effective in both in vitro and in vivo models of cancer, suggesting the potential use of these approaches in humans. Further studies on the anticancer efficacy and safety profile of these IgE-based approaches are warranted in preparation for translation toward clinical application.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Student > Bachelor 11 19%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2017.
All research outputs
#18,345,259
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#516
of 689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,872
of 356,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#30
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.