↓ Skip to main content

Resistance to Plague Among Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Populations

Overview of attention for article published in Vector Borne & Zoonotic Diseases, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resistance to Plague Among Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Populations
Published in
Vector Borne & Zoonotic Diseases, September 2011
DOI 10.1089/vbz.2011.0602
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tonie E. Rocke, Judy Williamson, Kacy R. Cobble, Joseph D. Busch, Michael F. Antolin, David M. Wagner

Abstract

In some rodent species frequently exposed to plague outbreaks caused by Yersinia pestis, resistance to the disease has evolved as a population trait. As a first step in determining if plague resistance has developed in black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus), animals captured from colonies in a plague-free region (South Dakota) and two plague-endemic regions (Colorado and Texas) were challenged with Y. pestis at one of three doses (2.5, 250, or 2500 mouse LD50s). South Dakota prairie dogs were far more susceptible to plague than Colorado and Texas prairie dogs (p<0.001), with a mortality rate of nearly 100% over all doses. Colorado and Texas prairie dogs were quite similar in their response, with overall survival rates of 50% and 60%, respectively. Prairie dogs from these states were heterogeneous in their response, with some animals dying at the lowest dose (37% and 20%, respectively) and some surviving even at the highest dose (29% and 40%, respectively). Microsatellite analysis revealed that all three groups were distinct genetically, but further studies are needed to establish a genetic basis for the observed differences in plague resistance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 9%
Unknown 48 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 28%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 53%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2011.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Vector Borne & Zoonotic Diseases
#1,138
of 1,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,761
of 129,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vector Borne & Zoonotic Diseases
#27
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.