Title |
The impact of obstetric mode of delivery on childhood behavior
|
---|---|
Published in |
Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00127-015-1055-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sukainah Y. Al Khalaf, Sinéad M. O’Neill, Linda M. O’Keeffe, Tine B. Henriksen, Louise C. Kenny, John F. Cryan, Ali S. Khashan |
Abstract |
We investigated the hypothesis that mode of delivery affects childhood behavior and motor development and examined whether there are sex-specific associations, i.e., whether males and females have different risk estimates. Families with infants born between December 2007 and May 2008 (N = 11,134) were randomly selected and recruited to the Growing Up in Ireland study. Mode of delivery was classified into spontaneous vaginal delivery; instrumental vaginal delivery; emergency Cesarean section (CS); and elective CS. The 'Ages and Stages Questionnaire' was completed at age 9-months and the 'Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire' at 3 years. Data were weighted to represent the national sample (N = 73,662) and multivariate logistic regression was used for the statistical analyses. At age 9 months, elective CS was associated with a delay in personal social skills [adjusted odds ratio, aOR 1.24; (95 % confidence interval, CI 1.04, 1.48)] and gross motor function [aOR 1.62, (95 % CI 1.34, 1.96)], whereas emergency CS was associated with delayed gross motor function [aOR 1.30, (95 % CI 1.06, 1.59)]. At age 3 years there was no significantly increased risk of an abnormal total SDQ score across all modes of delivery. Children born by elective CS may face a delay in cognitive and motor development at age 9 months. No increase in total SDQ score was found across all modes of delivery. Further investigation is needed to replicate these findings in other populations and explore the potential biological mechanisms. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Ireland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 98 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 22 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 17% |
Unknown | 19 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 25% |
Psychology | 19 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 30 | 30% |