↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of isometric subtalar pronator and supinator strength testing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability of isometric subtalar pronator and supinator strength testing
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13047-015-0075-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Hagen, Matthias Lahner, Martin Winhuysen, Christian Maiwald

Abstract

Due to the specific anatomy of the subtalar joint with its oblique axis, isometric pronator and supinator strength is not well documented. The purpose of this study was to determine intra- and between-session reliability of pronator and supinator strength and lower leg muscle activity measurements during maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC). Pronator and supinator peak torques (PT), with and without supplementary visual muscle strength biofeedback (FB), and muscular activities of peroneus longus (PL) and tibialis anterior (TA) were assessed twice 3 days apart by the same examiner in 21 healthy young male adults (mean age: 27.6 years; SD = 3.9). Limits of agreement (LoA) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were evaluated. By applying FB, reliability of both pronator and supinator PT was improved: LoA were reduced from 32% to 26% and from 20% to 18% and MDC from 20% to 15% and from 16% to 12% in supinator and pronator PT, respectively. Learning effects in pronator and supinator PT (p < 0.05), which were present without FB, were eliminated using FB. Except for TA during pronation, muscle activities showed low reliability indicated by LoA of 51% to 79%. Using supplementary biofeedback, isometric subtalar pronator and supinator strength testing is reliable in healthy subjects. LoA of 18% and 26% have to be exceeded for pronator and supinator PT, respectively, to detect relevant effects in repeated measures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Singapore 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 20%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 20%
Sports and Recreations 7 16%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 8 18%