↓ Skip to main content

The Role of the Upper Tidal Estuary in Wetland Blue Carbon Storage and Flux

Overview of attention for article published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of the Upper Tidal Estuary in Wetland Blue Carbon Storage and Flux
Published in
Global Biogeochemical Cycles, May 2018
DOI 10.1029/2018gb005897
Authors

Ken W. Krauss, Gregory B. Noe, Jamie A. Duberstein, William H. Conner, Camille L. Stagg, Nicole Cormier, Miriam C. Jones, Christopher E. Bernhardt, B. Graeme Lockaby, Andrew S. From, Thomas W. Doyle, Richard H. Day, Scott H. Ensign, Katherine N. Pierfelice, Cliff R. Hupp, Alex T. Chow, Julie L. Whitbeck

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 148 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 58 39%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 10%
Unspecified 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 34 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,853,906
of 17,902,988 outputs
Outputs from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#477
of 1,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,549
of 286,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,902,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.