↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of women’s satisfaction with maternal health care: a review of literature from developing countries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
269 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
973 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determinants of women’s satisfaction with maternal health care: a review of literature from developing countries
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12884-015-0525-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aradhana Srivastava, Bilal I Avan, Preety Rajbangshi, Sanghita Bhattacharyya

Abstract

Developing countries account for 99 percent of maternal deaths annually. While increasing service availability and maintaining acceptable quality standards, it is important to assess maternal satisfaction with care in order to make it more responsive and culturally acceptable, ultimately leading to enhanced utilization and improved outcomes. At a time when global efforts to reduce maternal mortality have been stepped up, maternal satisfaction and its determinants also need to be addressed by developing country governments. This review seeks to identify determinants of women's satisfaction with maternity care in developing countries. The review followed the methodology of systematic reviews. Public health and social science databases were searched. English articles covering antenatal, intrapartum or postpartum care, for either home or institutional deliveries, reporting maternal satisfaction from developing countries (World Bank list) were included, with no year limit. Out of 154 shortlisted abstracts, 54 were included and 100 excluded. Studies were extracted onto structured formats and analyzed using the narrative synthesis approach. Determinants of maternal satisfaction covered all dimensions of care across structure, process and outcome. Structural elements included good physical environment, cleanliness, and availability of adequate human resources, medicines and supplies. Process determinants included interpersonal behavior, privacy, promptness, cognitive care, perceived provider competency and emotional support. Outcome related determinants were health status of the mother and newborn. Access, cost, socio-economic status and reproductive history also influenced perceived maternal satisfaction. Process of care dominated the determinants of maternal satisfaction in developing countries. Interpersonal behavior was the most widely reported determinant, with the largest body of evidence generated around provider behavior in terms of courtesy and non-abuse. Other aspects of interpersonal behavior included therapeutic communication, staff confidence and competence and encouragement to laboring women. Quality improvement efforts in developing countries could focus on strengthening the process of care. Special attention is needed to improve interpersonal behavior, as evidence from the review points to the importance women attach to being treated respectfully, irrespective of socio-cultural or economic context. Further research on maternal satisfaction is required on home deliveries and relative strength of various determinants in influencing maternal satisfaction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 973 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Unknown 963 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 185 19%
Student > Bachelor 95 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 9%
Researcher 84 9%
Student > Postgraduate 76 8%
Other 173 18%
Unknown 272 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 232 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 229 24%
Social Sciences 87 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 21 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 2%
Other 93 10%
Unknown 293 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2015.
All research outputs
#12,727,600
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,276
of 4,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,527
of 265,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#49
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.