↓ Skip to main content

Amplitude-modulated electromagnetic fields for the treatment of cancer: Discovery of tumor-specific frequencies and assessment of a novel therapeutic approach

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 2,378)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
patent
15 patents
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amplitude-modulated electromagnetic fields for the treatment of cancer: Discovery of tumor-specific frequencies and assessment of a novel therapeutic approach
Published in
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, April 2009
DOI 10.1186/1756-9966-28-51
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre Barbault, Frederico P Costa, Brad Bottger, Reginald F Munden, Fin Bomholt, Niels Kuster, Boris Pasche

Abstract

Because in vitro studies suggest that low levels of electromagnetic fields may modify cancer cell growth, we hypothesized that systemic delivery of a combination of tumor-specific frequencies may have a therapeutic effect. We undertook this study to identify tumor-specific frequencies and test the feasibility of administering such frequencies to patients with advanced cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 145 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Student > Master 12 8%
Other 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 33 22%
Unknown 29 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 14%
Engineering 20 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Psychology 8 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,250,192
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#40
of 2,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,206
of 107,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,378 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.