You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the Association between Artificial Light-at-Night Exposure and Breast and Prostate Cancer Risk in Spain (MCC-Spain Study)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1289/ehp1837 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ariadna Garcia-Saenz, Alejandro Sánchez de Miguel, Ana Espinosa, Antonia Valentin, Núria Aragonés, Javier Llorca, Pilar Amiano, Vicente Martín Sánchez, Marcela Guevara, Rocío Capelo, Adonina Tardón, Rosana Peiró-Perez, José Juan Jiménez-Moleón, Aina Roca-Barceló, Beatriz Pérez-Gómez, Trinidad Dierssen-Sotos, Tania Fernández-Villa, Conchi Moreno-Iribas, Victor Moreno, Javier García-Pérez, Gemma Castaño-Vinyals, Marina Pollán, Martin Aubé, Manolis Kogevinas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 17 | 25% |
| United States | 8 | 12% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 86% |
| Scientists | 5 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 246 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 44 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 14% |
| Unknown | 68 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 56 | 23% |
| Unknown | 85 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 589. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#39,913
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
#49
of 8,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#875
of 340,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.