You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Does Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Testing and Counseling Reduce Modifiable Risk Factors? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Veterans
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-015-3315-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Corrine I. Voils, Cynthia J. Coffman, Janet M. Grubber, David Edelman, Azita Sadeghpour, Matthew L. Maciejewski, Jamiyla Bolton, Alex Cho, Geoffrey S. Ginsburg, William S. Yancy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 38% |
Colombia | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
Researcher | 11 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 12% |
Unknown | 57 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 6 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Other | 25 | 17% |
Unknown | 57 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,287,059
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,688
of 8,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,167
of 265,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#19
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.