↓ Skip to main content

High frequency temperature variability reduces the risk of coral bleaching

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
100 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
253 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
474 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High frequency temperature variability reduces the risk of coral bleaching
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-04074-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aryan Safaie, Nyssa J. Silbiger, Timothy R. McClanahan, Geno Pawlak, Daniel J. Barshis, James L. Hench, Justin S. Rogers, Gareth J. Williams, Kristen A. Davis

Abstract

Coral bleaching is the detrimental expulsion of algal symbionts from their cnidarian hosts, and predominantly occurs when corals are exposed to thermal stress. The incidence and severity of bleaching is often spatially heterogeneous within reef-scales (<1 km), and is therefore not predictable using conventional remote sensing products. Here, we systematically assess the relationship between in situ measurements of 20 environmental variables, along with seven remotely sensed SST thermal stress metrics, and 81 observed bleaching events at coral reef locations spanning five major reef regions globally. We find that high-frequency temperature variability (i.e., daily temperature range) was the most influential factor in predicting bleaching prevalence and had a mitigating effect, such that a 1 °C increase in daily temperature range would reduce the odds of more severe bleaching by a factor of 33. Our findings suggest that reefs with greater high-frequency temperature variability may represent particularly important opportunities to conserve coral ecosystems against the major threat posed by warming ocean temperatures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 474 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 474 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 19%
Student > Master 69 15%
Student > Bachelor 67 14%
Researcher 60 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 4%
Other 60 13%
Unknown 109 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122 26%
Environmental Science 100 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 42 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 7%
Psychology 7 1%
Other 36 8%
Unknown 134 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2020.
All research outputs
#379,256
of 24,661,251 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#6,103
of 53,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,792
of 331,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#148
of 1,157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,661,251 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.