↓ Skip to main content

Melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Disease Primers, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
110 X users
facebook
22 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
446 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
921 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Melanoma
Published in
Nature Reviews Disease Primers, April 2015
DOI 10.1038/nrdp.2015.3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirk Schadendorf, David E. Fisher, Claus Garbe, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Jean-Jacques Grob, Allan Halpern, Meenhard Herlyn, Michael A. Marchetti, Grant McArthur, Antoni Ribas, Alexander Roesch, Axel Hauschild

Abstract

Melanoma is a common cancer in the Western world with an increasing incidence. Sun exposure is still considered to be the major risk factor for melanoma. The prognosis of patients with malignant (advanced-stage) melanoma differs widely between countries, but public campaigns advocating early detection have led to significant reductions in mortality rates. As well as sun exposure, distinct genetic alterations have been identified as associated with melanoma. For example, families with melanoma who have germline mutations in CDKN2A are well known, whereas the vast majority of sporadic melanomas have mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade, which is the pathway with the highest oncogenic and therapeutic relevance for this disease. BRAF and NRAS mutations are typically found in cutaneous melanomas, whereas KIT mutations are predominantly observed in mucosal and acral melanomas. GNAQ and GNA11 mutations prevail in uveal melanomas. Additionally, the PI3K-AKT-PTEN pathway and the immune checkpoint pathways are important. The finding that programmed cell death protein 1 ligand 1 (PDL1) and PDL2 are expressed by melanoma cells, T cells, B cells and natural killer cells led to the recent development of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1)-specific antibodies (for example, nivolumab and pembrolizumab). Alongside other new drugs - namely, BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib and dabrafenib) and MEK inhibitors (trametinib and cobimetinib) - these agents are very promising and have been shown to significantly improve prognosis for patients with advanced-stage metastatic disease. Early signs are apparent that these new treatment modalities are also improving long-term clinical benefit and the quality of life of patients. This Primer summarizes the current understanding of melanoma, from mechanistic insights to clinical progress. For an illustrated summary of this Primer, visit: http://go.nature.com/vX2N9s.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 921 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Montenegro 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 910 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 150 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 142 15%
Student > Master 136 15%
Researcher 94 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 5%
Other 102 11%
Unknown 254 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 179 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 172 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 140 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 34 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 29 3%
Other 95 10%
Unknown 272 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#574,196
of 25,284,710 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#220
of 776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,641
of 271,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,284,710 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.