↓ Skip to main content

Briefing and debriefing during simulation-based training and beyond: Content, structure, attitude and setting

Overview of attention for article published in Bailliere's Best Practice & Research, Clinical Anaesthesiology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Briefing and debriefing during simulation-based training and beyond: Content, structure, attitude and setting
Published in
Bailliere's Best Practice & Research, Clinical Anaesthesiology, March 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bpa.2015.01.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kolbe, Michaela, Grande, Bastian, Spahn, Donat R

Abstract

In this article, we review the debriefing literature and point to the dilemma that although debriefings especially intend to enhance team (rather than individual) learning, it is particularly this team setting that poses risks for debriefing effectiveness (e.g., preference-consistent information sharing, lack of psychological safety inhibiting structured information sharing, ineffective debriefing models). These risks can be managed with a mindful approach with respect to content (e.g., specific learning objectives), structure (e.g., reactions phase, analysis phase, summary phase), attitude (e.g., honesty, curiosity, holding the trainee in positive regard) and setting (e.g., briefings to provide orientation and establish psychological safety). We point to the potential of integrating systemic methods such as circular questions into debriefings, discuss the empirical evidence for debriefing effectiveness and highlight the importance of faculty development.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 119 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Researcher 13 10%
Other 11 9%
Professor 10 8%
Other 48 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 16%
Psychology 14 11%
Unspecified 11 9%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Other 6 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2015.
All research outputs
#3,558,400
of 5,030,622 outputs
Outputs from Bailliere's Best Practice & Research, Clinical Anaesthesiology
#62
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,165
of 156,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bailliere's Best Practice & Research, Clinical Anaesthesiology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,030,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.