↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
229 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003412.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona J Bath-Hextall, William Perkins, Jan Bong, Hywel C Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 168 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 13%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Other 40 23%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 35 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,693,831
of 13,603,158 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,390
of 10,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,021
of 227,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,603,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.