↓ Skip to main content

When Does the Future Begin? Time Metrics Matter, Connecting Present and Future Selves

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.), April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
64 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When Does the Future Begin? Time Metrics Matter, Connecting Present and Future Selves
Published in
Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.), April 2015
DOI 10.1177/0956797615572231
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil A. Lewis, Daphna Oyserman

Abstract

People assume they should attend to the present; their future self can handle the future. This seemingly plausible rule of thumb can lead people astray, in part because some future events require current action. In order for the future to energize and motivate current action, it must feel imminent. To create this sense of imminence, we manipulated time metric-the units (e.g., days, years) in which time is considered. People interpret accessible time metrics in two ways: If preparation for the future is under way (Studies 1 and 2), people interpret metrics as implying when a future event will occur. If preparation is not under way (Studies 3-5), they interpret metrics as implying when preparation should start (e.g., planning to start saving 4 times sooner for a retirement in 10,950 days instead of 30 years). Time metrics mattered not because they changed how distal or important future events felt (Study 6), but because they changed how connected and congruent their current and future selves felt (Study 7).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Trinidad and Tobago 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 157 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 24%
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 35 21%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 92 55%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 10%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Engineering 5 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 26 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 282. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2020.
All research outputs
#60,717
of 16,267,187 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.)
#204
of 3,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#960
of 232,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.)
#5
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,267,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 70.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.