↓ Skip to main content

Structure of the Bacillus subtilis 70S ribosome reveals the basis for species-specific stalling

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structure of the Bacillus subtilis 70S ribosome reveals the basis for species-specific stalling
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms7941
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Sohmen, Shinobu Chiba, Naomi Shimokawa-Chiba, C. Axel Innis, Otto Berninghausen, Roland Beckmann, Koreaki Ito, Daniel N. Wilson

Abstract

Ribosomal stalling is used to regulate gene expression and can occur in a species-specific manner. Stalling during translation of the MifM leader peptide regulates expression of the downstream membrane protein biogenesis factor YidC2 (YqjG) in Bacillus subtilis, but not in Escherichia coli. In the absence of structures of Gram-positive bacterial ribosomes, a molecular basis for species-specific stalling has remained unclear. Here we present the structure of a Gram-positive B. subtilis MifM-stalled 70S ribosome at 3.5-3.9 Å, revealing a network of interactions between MifM and the ribosomal tunnel, which stabilize a non-productive conformation of the PTC that prevents aminoacyl-tRNA accommodation and thereby induces translational arrest. Complementary genetic analyses identify a single amino acid within ribosomal protein L22 that dictates the species specificity of the stalling event. Such insights expand our understanding of how the synergism between the ribosome and the nascent chain is utilized to modulate the translatome in a species-specific manner.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 149 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 29%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Professor 9 6%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 68 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 27%
Chemistry 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 26 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2015.
All research outputs
#17,754,724
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#43,171
of 46,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,827
of 265,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#656
of 745 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 745 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.