↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of antenatal steroids

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and safety of antenatal steroids
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology, April 2018
DOI 10.1152/ajpregu.00193.2017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew W Kemp, Alan H Jobe, Haruo Usuda, Peter W Nathanielsz, Cun Li, Anderson Kuo, Hillary F Huber, Geoffrey D Clarke, Masatoshi Saito, John P Newnham, Sarah J Stock

Abstract

Antenatal steroids (ANS) are among the most important and widely utilised interventions to improve outcomes for preterm infants. A significant body of evidence demonstrates improved outcomes in preterm infants (24-34 weeks) delivered between 1 and 7 days after the administration of a single course of antenatal steroids (ANS). Moreover, ANS have the advantage of being widely available, low cost, and easily administered via maternal intramuscular injection. The use of ANS to mature the fetal lung is, however, not without contention. Their use in pregnancy is not FDA approved and treatment doses and regimens remain largely un-optimized. Their mode of use varies considerably between countries, and there are lingering concerns regarding the safety of exposing the fetus to high doses of exogenous steroids. A significant proportion of women deliver outside of the 1-7 day therapeutic window after ANS treatment, and this delay may be associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes for both mother and baby. Today, animal-based studies are one means by which key questions of dosing and safety relating to ANS may be resolved, allowing for further refinement/s of this important therapy. Complementary approaches using non-human primates, sheep and rodents have provided invaluable advances to our understanding of how exogenous steroid exposure impacts fetal development. Focussing on these three major model groups, this review highlights the role of three key animal models (sheep, non-human primates, rodents) in the development of antenatal steroid therapy, and provides an up-to-date synthesis of current efforts to refine this therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,229,642
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology
#1,273
of 2,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,282
of 343,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology
#21
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.