Title |
The long-term outcome of patients with heroin use disorder/dual disorder (chronic psychosis) after admission to enhanced methadone maintenance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of General Psychiatry, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12991-018-0185-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Angelo G. I. Maremmani, Alessandro Pallucchini, Luca Rovai, Silvia Bacciardi, Vincenza Spera, Marco Maiello, Giulio Perugi, Icro Maremmani |
Abstract |
Over-standard methadone doses are generally needed in the treatment of heroin use disorder (HUD) patients that display concomitant high-severity psychopathological symptomatology. A flexible dosing regimen may lead to higher retention rates in dual disorder (DD), as we demonstrated in bipolar 1 HUD patients, leading to outcomes that are as satisfactory as those of HUD patients without high-severity psychopathological symptomatology. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of treatment-resistant chronic psychosis HUD patients (PSY-HUD) with those of peers without dual disorder (HUD). 85 HUD patients who also met the criteria for treatment resistance-25 of them affected by chronic psychosis and 60 without DD-were monitored prospectively for up to 8 years while continuing to receive enhanced methadone maintenance treatment. The rates of endurance in the treatment of PSY-HUD patients were 36%, compared with 34% for HUD patients (p = 0.872). After 3 years of treatment, these rates tended to become progressively more stable. PSY-HUD patients showed better outcome results than HUD patients regarding CGI severity (p < 0.001) and DSM-IV-GAF (p < 0.001). No differences were found regarding good toxicological outcomes or the methadone dosages used to achieve stabilization. The time required to stabilize PSY-HUD patients was shorter (p = 0.034). An enhanced methadone maintenance treatment seems to be equally effective in patients with PSY-HUD and those with HUD. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Kazakhstan | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
Researcher | 5 | 12% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 15 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 10 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 18 | 42% |