| Title |
An enigmatic plant-eating theropod from the Late Jurassic period of Chile
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature14307 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fernando E. Novas, Leonardo Salgado, Manuel Suárez, Federico L. Agnolín, Martín D. Ezcurra, Nicolás R. Chimento, Rita de la Cruz, Marcelo P. Isasi, Alexander O. Vargas, David Rubilar-Rogers |
| Abstract |
Theropod dinosaurs were the dominant predators in most Mesozoic era terrestrial ecosystems. Early theropod evolution is currently interpreted as the diversification of various carnivorous and cursorial taxa, whereas the acquisition of herbivorism, together with the secondary loss of cursorial adaptations, occurred much later among advanced coelurosaurian theropods. A new, bizarre herbivorous basal tetanuran from the Upper Jurassic of Chile challenges this conception. The new dinosaur was discovered at Aysén, a fossil locality in the Upper Jurassic Toqui Formation of southern Chile (General Carrera Lake). The site yielded abundant and exquisitely preserved three-dimensional skeletons of small archosaurs. Several articulated individuals of Chilesaurus at different ontogenetic stages have been collected, as well as less abundant basal crocodyliforms, and fragmentary remains of sauropod dinosaurs (diplodocids and titanosaurians). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 270 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 65 | 24% |
| United States | 26 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 4% |
| Japan | 9 | 3% |
| Spain | 4 | 1% |
| France | 4 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 23 | 9% |
| Unknown | 120 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 217 | 80% |
| Scientists | 45 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 21% |
| Researcher | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 32% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 46 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 941. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#17,137
of 24,909,203 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,728
of 96,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126
of 270,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#24
of 999 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,909,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 999 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.