You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Strategies to improve palatability and increase consumption intentions for Momordica charantia(bitter melon): A vegetable commonly used for diabetes management
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, July 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-10-78 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laura S Snee, Vivek R Nerurkar, Dian A Dooley, Jimmy T Efird, Anne C Shovic, Pratibha V Nerurkar |
Abstract |
Although beneficial to health, dietary phytonutrients are bitter, acid and/or astringent in taste and therefore reduce consumer choice and acceptance during food selection. Momordica charantia, commonly known as bitter melon has been traditionally used in Ayurvedic and Chinese medicine to treat diabetes and its complications. The aim of this study was to develop bitter melon-containing recipes and test their palatability and acceptability in healthy individuals for future clinical studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 113 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 33 | 28% |
Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
Researcher | 10 | 9% |
Lecturer | 8 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
Other | 19 | 16% |
Unknown | 28 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2011.
All research outputs
#15,236,094
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,153
of 1,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,767
of 119,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#18
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.