Peer 2
Sorry, I meant the affair around the original arsenic paper in "Science", which I guess is not the target of your "some obscure journal"?
Sorry, I meant the affair around the original arsenic paper in "Science", which I guess is not the target of your "some obscure journal"?
Is it really a "fiasco"? Put these things in perspective, is a paper in some obscure journal really that influential. It is only a fiasco in your mind.
There is something fittingly ambiguous about the journal name: "Current Pollution Reports". From there only a small step to something along the lines of Reports Currently Polluting Science or Science…
A disheartening example of the long lasting effects of leaving the "arseniclife" paper unretracted as of 2015.The authors of this paper think that the original Wolfe-Simon publication actually…