You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PKCα promotes the mesenchymal to amoeboid transition and increases cancer cell invasiveness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-015-1347-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katarína Vaškovičová, Emilia Szabadosová, Vladimír Čermák, Aneta Gandalovičová, Lenka Kasalová, Daniel Rösel, Jan Brábek |
| Abstract |
The local invasion of tumor cells into the surrounding tissue is the first and most critical step of the metastatic cascade. Cells can invade either collectively, or individually. Individual cancer cell invasion can occur in the mesenchymal or amoeboid mode, which are mutually interchangeable. This plasticity of individual cancer cell invasiveness may represent an escape mechanism for invading cancer cells from anti-metastatic treatment. To identify new signaling proteins involved in the plasticity of cancer cell invasiveness, we performed proteomic analysis of the amoeboid to mesenchymal transition with A375m2 melanoma cells in a 3D Matrigel matrix. In this screen we identified PKCα as an important protein for the maintenance of amoeboid morphology. We found that the activation of PKCα resulted in the mesenchymal-amoeboid transition of mesenchymal K2 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines. Consistently, PKCα inhibition led to the amoeboid-mesenchymal transition of amoeboid A375m2 cells. Next, we showed that PKCα inhibition resulted in a considerable decrease in the invading abilities of all analyzed cancer cell lines. Our results suggest that PKCα is an important protein for maintenance of the amoeboid morphology of cancer cells, and that downregulation of PKCα results in the amoeboid to mesenchymal transition. Our data also suggest that PKCα is important for both mesenchymal and amoeboid invasiveness, making it an attractive target for anti-metastatic therapies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,330,127
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,106
of 8,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,046
of 264,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#130
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.