You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cheminformatics, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1758-2946-3-33 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Noel M O'Boyle, Michael Banck, Craig A James, Chris Morley, Tim Vandermeersch, Geoffrey R Hutchison |
| Abstract |
A frequent problem in computational modeling is the interconversion of chemical structures between different formats. While standard interchange formats exist (for example, Chemical Markup Language) and de facto standards have arisen (for example, SMILES format), the need to interconvert formats is a continuing problem due to the multitude of different application areas for chemistry data, differences in the data stored by different formats (0D versus 3D, for example), and competition between software along with a lack of vendor-neutral formats. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 15% |
| Russia | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Scientists | 8 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 21 | <1% |
| United States | 17 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | <1% |
| Brazil | 9 | <1% |
| Spain | 5 | <1% |
| Czechia | 5 | <1% |
| India | 5 | <1% |
| Portugal | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 35 | <1% |
| Unknown | 4109 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 768 | 18% |
| Researcher | 523 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 476 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 470 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 152 | 4% |
| Other | 615 | 15% |
| Unknown | 1219 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 822 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 638 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 411 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 241 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 138 | 3% |
| Other | 611 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1362 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#351,961
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
#2
of 984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,261
of 150,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.