↓ Skip to main content

Routine provision of information on patient-reported outcome measures to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Routine provision of information on patient-reported outcome measures to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011589
Authors

Daniela C. Gonçalves Bradley, Chris Gibbons, Ignacio Ricci-Cabello, Niklas JH Bobrovitz, Elizabeth J Gibbons, Anna Kotzeva, Jordi Alonso, Ray Fitzpatrick, Peter Bower, Philip J van der Wees, Luis Rajmil, Nia W Roberts, Rod S Taylor, Joanne Greenhalgh, Ian Porter, Jose M. Valderas

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 191 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 23%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 14%
Psychology 14 7%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Unspecified 7 4%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 45 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,574,333
of 12,762,431 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,685
of 10,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,526
of 225,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#168
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,762,431 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.