You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Routine provision of information on patient‐reported outcome measures to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011589 |
| Authors |
Daniela C. Gonçalves Bradley, Chris Gibbons, Ignacio Ricci‐Cabello, Niklas JH Bobrovitz, Elizabeth J Gibbons, Anna Kotzeva, Jordi Alonso, Ray Fitzpatrick, Peter Bower, Philip J van der Wees, Luis Rajmil, Nia W Roberts, Rod S Taylor, Joanne Greenhalgh, Ian Porter, Jose M. Valderas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Singapore | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 257 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 21% |
| Researcher | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 16% |
| Unknown | 57 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 15% |
| Psychology | 17 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 72 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,295,244
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,395
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,194
of 278,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#166
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.