↓ Skip to main content

Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and healthcare outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and healthcare outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002099.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Urquhart, Rosemary Currell, Maria J Grant, Nicholas R Hardiker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Canada 4 1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 269 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 23%
Researcher 42 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Librarian 11 4%
Other 64 22%
Unknown 42 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 68 24%
Social Sciences 29 10%
Psychology 16 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 4%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 47 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,295,876
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,728
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,156
of 185,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.