↓ Skip to main content

Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and healthcare outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and healthcare outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002099.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Urquhart, Rosemary Currell, Maria J Grant, Nicholas R Hardiker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 77 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Student > Master 3 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Unknown 69 88%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Unknown 69 88%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2015.
All research outputs
#1,072,951
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,089
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,276
of 226,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.