The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Polinização natural e artificial da cherimóia (Annona cherimola Mill.) no Estado de São Paulo
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, April 2003
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0100-29452002000300013 |
Authors |
Marcelo Rosa Melo, Celso Valdevino Pommer, Ryosuke Kavati, Takanoli Tokunaga |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 24% |
Professor | 4 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 76% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 10% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2015.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura
#117
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,274
of 54,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.