↓ Skip to main content

Statins for women with polycystic ovary syndrome not actively trying to conceive

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statins for women with polycystic ovary syndrome not actively trying to conceive
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008565.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amit D Raval, Tamara Hunter, Bronwyn Stuckey, Roger J Hart

Abstract

Statins, as lipid-lowering agents with pleiotropic actions, are likely not only to improve the dyslipidaemia associated with polycystic ovary syndrome but may also exert other beneficial metabolic and endocrine effects.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 143 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 17%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 40 27%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Unspecified 6 4%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 23 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,358,865
of 15,848,357 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,999
of 11,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,971
of 104,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,848,357 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.