↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of reference genes for insect olfaction studies

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of reference genes for insect olfaction studies
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-0862-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bonaventure Aman Omondi, Jose Manuel Latorre-Estivalis, Ivana Helena Rocha Oliveira, Rickard Ignell, Marcelo Gustavo Lorenzo

Abstract

Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) is a robust and accessible method to assay gene expression and to infer gene regulation. Being a chain of procedures, this technique is subject to systematic error due to biological and technical limitations mainly set by the starting material and downstream procedures. Thus, rigorous data normalization is critical to grant reliability and repeatability of gene expression quantification by qRT-PCR. A number of 'housekeeping genes', involved in basic cellular functions, have been commonly used as internal controls for this normalization process. However, these genes could themselves be regulated and must therefore be tested a priori. We evaluated eight reference genes for their stability as internal controls of olfactory gene expression in the antennae of Rhodnius prolixus, a Chagas disease vector. Five experimental conditions, including changes in age, developmental stage and feeding status were tested in both sexes. We show that the evaluation of candidate reference genes is necessary for each combination of sex, tissue and physiological condition analyzed in order to avoid inconsistent results and conclusions. Although, Normfinder and geNorm software yielded different results between males and females, five genes (SDH, Tub, GAPDH, Act and G6PDH) appeared in the first positions in all rankings obtained. By using gene expression data of a single olfactory co-receptor gene as an example, we demonstrated the extent of changes expected using different internal standards. This work underlines the need for a rigorous selection of internal standards to grant the reliability of normalization processes in qRT-PCR studies. Furthermore, it is shown that particular physiological or developmental conditions require independent evaluation of a diverse set of potential reference genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 25%
Student > Master 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 15%
Computer Science 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2016.
All research outputs
#13,434,323
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,454
of 5,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,020
of 265,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#53
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.