↓ Skip to main content

Principles for consistent value assessment and sustainable funding of orphan drugs in Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Principles for consistent value assessment and sustainable funding of orphan drugs in Europe
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13023-015-0269-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Gutierrez, Julien Patris, Adam Hutchings, Warren Cowell

Abstract

The European Orphan Medicinal Products (OMP) Regulation has successfully encouraged research to develop treatments for rare diseases resulting in the authorisation of new OMPs in Europe. While decisions on OMP designation and marketing authorisation are made at the European Union level, reimbursement decisions are made at the national level. OMP value and affordability are high priority issues for policymakers and decisions regarding their pricing and funding are highly complex. There is currently no European consensus on how OMP value should be assessed and inequalities of access to OMPs have previously been observed. Against this background, policy makers in many countries are considering reforms to improve access to OMPs. This paper proposes ten principles to be considered when undertaking such reforms, from the perspective of an OMP manufacturer. We recommend the continued prioritisation of rare diseases by policymakers, an increased alignment between payer and regulatory frameworks, pricing centred on orphan medicinal product value, and mechanisms to ensure long-term financial sustainability allowing a continuous and virtuous development of orphan medicinal products. Our recommendations support the development of more consistent frameworks and encourage collaboration between all stakeholders, including research-based industry, payers, clinicians, and patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 126 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 23%
Student > Master 24 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 6%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 30 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,794,732
of 23,506,136 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#185
of 2,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,829
of 265,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,506,136 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.