↓ Skip to main content

The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Economics, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation
Published in
Ecological Economics, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.018
Authors

Leslie Richardson, John Loomis, Timm Kroeger, Frank Casey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 366 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 90 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 20%
Researcher 69 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Student > Bachelor 25 7%
Other 54 14%
Unknown 38 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 130 34%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 69 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 12%
Social Sciences 22 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 3%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 67 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,349,857
of 17,356,510 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Economics
#900
of 3,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,166
of 235,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Economics
#11
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,356,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.