↓ Skip to main content

Spine pruning drives antipsychotic-sensitive locomotion via circuit control of striatal dopamine

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
23 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spine pruning drives antipsychotic-sensitive locomotion via circuit control of striatal dopamine
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, May 2015
DOI 10.1038/nn.4015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Il Hwan Kim, Mark A Rossi, Dipendra K Aryal, Bence Racz, Namsoo Kim, Akiyoshi Uezu, Fan Wang, William C Wetsel, Richard J Weinberg, Henry Yin, Scott H Soderling

Abstract

Psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders may arise from anomalies in long-range neuronal connectivity downstream of pathologies in dendritic spines. However, the mechanisms that may link spine pathology to circuit abnormalities relevant to atypical behavior remain unknown. Using a mouse model to conditionally disrupt a critical regulator of the dendritic spine cytoskeleton, the actin-related protein 2/3 complex (Arp2/3), we report here a molecular mechanism that unexpectedly reveals the inter-relationship of progressive spine pruning, elevated frontal cortical excitation of pyramidal neurons and striatal hyperdopaminergia in a cortical-to-midbrain circuit abnormality. The main symptomatic manifestations of this circuit abnormality are psychomotor agitation and stereotypical behaviors, which are relieved by antipsychotics. Moreover, this antipsychotic-responsive locomotion can be mimicked in wild-type mice by optogenetic activation of this circuit. Collectively these results reveal molecular and neural-circuit mechanisms, illustrating how diverse pathologies may converge to drive behaviors relevant to psychiatric disorders.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 283 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 83 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 24%
Student > Master 25 8%
Student > Bachelor 22 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Other 42 14%
Unknown 36 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 92 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 6%
Psychology 11 4%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 46 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#397,589
of 24,877,044 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#732
of 5,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,351
of 269,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#18
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,877,044 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.