You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hot water extract of Chlorella vulgaris induced DNA damage and apoptosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1807-59322010001200023 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yasmin Anum Mohd Yusof, Suhana Md. Saad, Suzana Makpol, Nor Aripin Shamaan, Wan Zurinah Wan Ngah |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to determine the antiproliferative and apoptotic effects of hot water extracts of Chlorella vulgaris on hepatoma cell line HepG2. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Chile | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,542,910
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#94
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,119
of 172,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#1
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.