↓ Skip to main content

The Interplay of Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy: Harnessing Potential Synergies

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology Research, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
646 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
503 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Interplay of Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy: Harnessing Potential Synergies
Published in
Cancer Immunology Research, May 2015
DOI 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-15-0064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leisha A Emens, Gary Middleton

Abstract

Although cancer chemotherapy has historically been considered immune suppressive, it is now accepted that certain chemotherapies can augment tumor immunity. The recent success of immune checkpoint inhibitors has renewed interest in immunotherapies, and in combining them with chemotherapy to achieve additive or synergistic clinical activity. Two major ways that chemotherapy promotes tumor immunity are by inducing immunogenic cell death as part of its intended therapeutic effect and by disrupting strategies that tumors use to evade immune recognition. This second strategy, in particular, is dependent on the drug, its dose, and the schedule of chemotherapy administration in relation to antigen exposure or release. In this Cancer Immunology at the Crossroads article, we focus on cancer vaccines and immune checkpoint blockade as a forum for reviewing preclinical and clinical data demonstrating the interplay between immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Cancer Immunol Res; 3(5); 436-43. ©2015 AACR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 503 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 499 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 18%
Researcher 83 17%
Student > Bachelor 53 11%
Student > Master 44 9%
Other 37 7%
Other 69 14%
Unknown 124 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 49 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 28 6%
Other 50 10%
Unknown 151 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,320,660
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology Research
#126
of 1,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,427
of 265,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology Research
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.