↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of psychoactive substance use among youth in Rwanda

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of psychoactive substance use among youth in Rwanda
Published in
BMC Research Notes, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1148-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maurice Kanyoni, Darius Gishoma, Vedaste Ndahindwa

Abstract

Substance use among youth is a significant public health concern worldwide. However, little is known in Rwanda about the prevalence of drug use among youth. The goal of the current study was to assess the prevalence and determinants of substance use among youth in Rwanda. A cross-sectional home survey was carried out with 2479 Rwandan youth. Youth ranging, in age from 14-35 years, were randomly selected from 20 out of the 30 districts in the country. The youth were interviewed using a questionnaire that included socio-demographic information and self-reported substance use. Misuse and dependence on alcohol, marijuana and tobacco were respectively assessed by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), the Cannabis Abuse Screening Test (CAST), and the Hooked on Nicotine Checklist (HONC). Overall, the prevalence rate of substance use over the month prior to the survey was 34% for alcohol, 8.5% for tobacco smoking, 2.7% for cannabis, 0.2% for glue and 0.1% for drugs such as diazepam. 7.46% (one in thirteen) of the youth were alcohol dependent, 4.88% (one in twenty) were nicotine dependent, and 2.54% (one in forty) dependent on cannabis. Our findings demonstrate that tobacco, alcohol, marijuana and other substance use are realities in the daily lives of youth in Rwanda. Further research is needed to monitor the evolution of this phenomenon and its determinants and in order to initiate evidenced-based interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 255 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 20%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Student > Postgraduate 21 8%
Researcher 18 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 5%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 90 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 16%
Psychology 20 8%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 96 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#15,222,793
of 25,450,869 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,875
of 4,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,828
of 279,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#40
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,450,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.