↓ Skip to main content

Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
16 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004074.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

McDonald SJ, Middleton P, McDonald, Susan J, Middleton, Philippa

Abstract

Policies for timing of cord clamping vary, with early cord clamping generally carried out in the first 60 seconds after birth, whereas later cord clamping usually involves clamping the umbilical cord greater than one minute after the birth or when cord pulsation has ceased.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 164 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Postgraduate 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Other 49 27%
Unknown 7 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 12%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 9 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#925,527
of 14,679,000 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,748
of 11,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,816
of 100,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,679,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.