↓ Skip to main content

Common clonal origin of central and resident memory T cells following skin immunization

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Medicine, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
237 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Common clonal origin of central and resident memory T cells following skin immunization
Published in
Nature Medicine, May 2015
DOI 10.1038/nm.3860
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivier Gaide, Ryan O Emerson, Xiaodong Jiang, Nicholas Gulati, Suzanne Nizza, Cindy Desmarais, Harlan Robins, James G Krueger, Rachael A Clark, Thomas S Kupper

Abstract

Central memory T (TCM) cells in lymph nodes (LNs) and resident memory T (TRM) cells in peripheral tissues have distinct roles in protective immunity. Both are generated after primary infections, but their clonal origins have been unclear. To address this question, we immunized mice through the skin with a protein antigen, a chemical hapten, or a non-replicating poxvirus. We then analyzed antigen-activated T cells from different tissues using high-throughput sequencing (HTS) of the gene encoding the T cell receptor (TCR) β-chain (Trb, also known as Tcrb) using CDR3 sequences to simultaneously track thousands of unique T cells. For every abundant TRM cell clone generated in the skin, an abundant TCM cell clone bearing the identical TCR was present in the LNs. Thus, antigen-reactive skin TRM and LN TCM cell clones were derived from a common naive T cell precursor after skin immunization, generating overlapping TCR repertoires. Although they bore the same TCR, TRM cells mediated rapid contact hypersensitivity responses, whereas TCM cells mediated delayed and attenuated responses. Studies in human subjects confirmed the generation of skin TRM cells in allergic contact dermatitis. Thus, immunization through skin simultaneously generates skin TRM and LN TCM cells in similar numbers from the same naive T cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 334 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 108 32%
Researcher 69 20%
Student > Master 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 45 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 89 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 86 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 62 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 17 5%
Unknown 54 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,672,771
of 24,411,829 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#3,213
of 8,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,345
of 268,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#45
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,411,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.