↓ Skip to main content

Mutant U2AF1 Expression Alters Hematopoiesis and Pre-mRNA Splicing In Vivo.

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Cell, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutant U2AF1 Expression Alters Hematopoiesis and Pre-mRNA Splicing In Vivo.
Published in
Cancer Cell, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.04.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shirai, Cara Lunn, Ley, James N, White, Brian S, Kim, Sanghyun, Tibbitts, Justin, Shao, Jin, Ndonwi, Matthew, Wadugu, Brian, Duncavage, Eric J, Okeyo-Owuor, Theresa, Liu, Tuoen, Griffith, Malachi, McGrath, Sean, Magrini, Vincent, Fulton, Robert S, Fronick, Catrina, O'Laughlin, Michelle, Graubert, Timothy A, Walter, Matthew J

Abstract

Heterozygous somatic mutations in the spliceosome gene U2AF1 occur in ∼11% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), the most common adult myeloid malignancy. It is unclear how these mutations contribute to disease. We examined in vivo hematopoietic consequences of the most common U2AF1 mutation using a doxycycline-inducible transgenic mouse model. Mice expressing mutant U2AF1(S34F) display altered hematopoiesis and changes in pre-mRNA splicing in hematopoietic progenitor cells by whole transcriptome analysis (RNA-seq). Integration with human RNA-seq datasets determined that common mutant U2AF1-induced splicing alterations are enriched in RNA processing genes, ribosomal genes, and recurrently mutated MDS and acute myeloid leukemia-associated genes. These findings support the hypothesis that mutant U2AF1 alters downstream gene isoform expression, thereby contributing to abnormal hematopoiesis in patients with MDS.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 88 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 36%
Researcher 27 28%
Student > Master 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Professor 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 21%
Unspecified 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 5 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2015.
All research outputs
#1,825,408
of 8,509,576 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell
#722
of 1,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,656
of 211,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell
#18
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,509,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.