↓ Skip to main content

High prevalence of CDH23 mutations in patients with congenital high-frequency sporadic or recessively inherited hearing loss

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High prevalence of CDH23 mutations in patients with congenital high-frequency sporadic or recessively inherited hearing loss
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13023-015-0276-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kunio Mizutari, Hideki Mutai, Kazunori Namba, Yuko Miyanaga, Atsuko Nakano, Yukiko Arimoto, Sawako Masuda, Noriko Morimoto, Hirokazu Sakamoto, Kimitaka Kaga, Tatsuo Matsunaga

Abstract

Mutations in CDH23 are responsible for Usher syndrome 1D and recessive non-syndromic hearing loss. In this study, we revealed the prevalence of CDH23 mutations among patients with specific clinical characteristics. After excluding patients with GJB2 mutations and mitochondrial m.1555A > G and m.3243A > G mutations, subjects for CDH23 mutation analysis were selected according to the following criteria: 1) Sporadic or recessively inherited hearing loss 2) bilateral non-syndromic congenital hearing loss, 3) no cochlear malformation, 4) a poorer hearing level at high frequencies than at low frequencies, and 5) severe or profound hearing loss at higher frequencies. Seventy-two subjects were selected from 621 consecutive probands who did not have environmental causes for their hearing loss. After direct sequencing, 13 of the 72 probands (18.1%) had homozygous or compound heterozygous CDH23 mutations. In total, we identified 16 CDH23 mutations, including five novel mutations. The 16 mutations included 12 missense, two frameshift, and two splice-site mutations. These results revealed that CDH23 mutations are highly prevalent in patients with congenital high-frequency sporadic or recessively inherited hearing loss and that the mutation spectrum was diverse, indicating that patients with these clinical features merit genetic analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Other 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2015.
All research outputs
#3,100,258
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#414
of 2,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,160
of 264,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#8
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.