↓ Skip to main content

Retraction Note: Gene expression profiles analysis identifies key genes for acute lung injury in patients with sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retraction Note: Gene expression profiles analysis identifies key genes for acute lung injury in patients with sepsis
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13000-015-0237-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiqiang Guo, Chuncheng Zhao, Zheng Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Design 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,279,973
of 14,641,855 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#254
of 883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,328
of 229,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,641,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them