↓ Skip to main content

Biologically and diagenetically derived peptide modifications in moa collagens

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Biologically and diagenetically derived peptide modifications in moa collagens
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2015
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2015.0015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy P. Cleland, Elena R. Schroeter, Mary H. Schweitzer

Abstract

The modifications that occur on proteins in natural environments over time are not well studied, yet characterizing them is vital to correctly interpret sequence data recovered from fossils. The recently extinct moa (Dinornithidae) is an excellent candidate for investigating the preservation of proteins, their post-translational modifications (PTMs) and diagenetic alterations during degradation. Moa protein extracts were analysed using mass spectrometry, and peptides from collagen I, collagen II and collagen V were identified. We also identified biologically derived PTMs (i.e. methylation, di-methylation, alkylation, hydroxylation, fucosylation) on amino acids at locations consistent with extant proteins. In addition to these in vivo modifications, we detected novel modifications that are probably diagenetically derived. These include loss of hydroxylation/glutamic semialdehyde, carboxymethyllysine and peptide backbone cleavage, as well as previously noted deamidation. Moa collagen sequences and modifications provide a baseline by which to evaluate proteomic studies of other fossils, and a framework for defining the molecular relationship of moa to other closely related taxa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 39%
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 15%
Chemistry 6 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 12%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,482,845
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#3,282
of 11,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,309
of 280,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#69
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.