↓ Skip to main content

The Holocene history of the North American Monsoon: ‘known knowns’ and ‘known unknowns’ in understanding its spatial and temporal complexity

Overview of attention for article published in Quaternary Science Reviews, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Holocene history of the North American Monsoon: ‘known knowns’ and ‘known unknowns’ in understanding its spatial and temporal complexity
Published in
Quaternary Science Reviews, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.04.004
Authors

Sarah E. Metcalfe, John A. Barron, Sarah J. Davies

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Mexico 1 <1%
Jamaica 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 100 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 22%
Student > Master 19 17%
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Other 8 7%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 57 52%
Environmental Science 18 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Chemistry 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 11 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2015.
All research outputs
#3,526,333
of 12,292,260 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#887
of 2,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,845
of 229,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#27
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,292,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.