You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pre‐operative intra aortic balloon pumps in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004472.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Theologou, Mohamad Bashir, Arvind Rengarajan, Omar Khan, Tom Spyt, David Richens, Mark Field |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 27% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,167,676
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,106
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,457
of 194,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.